[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d336bc4d-55fb-d397-0a99-33d86d704f51@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:19:31 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] KVM: Add virtualization support of split lock
detection
Hi Thomas,
On 5/18/2020 9:27 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 5/9/2020 7:05 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> This series aims to add the virtualization of split lock detection in
>> KVM.
>>
>> Due to the fact that split lock detection is tightly coupled with CPU
>> model and CPU model is configurable by host VMM, we elect to use
>> paravirt method to expose and enumerate it for guest.
>
> Thomas and Paolo,
>
> Do you have time to have a look at this version?
Does this series have any chance to meet 5.8?
If not, do you plan to take a look at it after merge window?
Thanks,
-Xiaoyao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists