lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 10:26:23 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kobject: send KOBJ_REMOVE uevent when the object is
 removed from sysfs

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:58 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 03:49:01PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 8:34 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is possible for a KOBJ_REMOVE uevent to be sent to userspace way
> > > after the files are actually gone from sysfs, due to how reference
> > > counting for kobjects work.  This should not be a problem, but it would
> > > be good to properly send the information when things are going away, not
> > > at some later point in time in the future.
> > >
> > > Before this move, if a kobject's parent was torn down before the child,
> >
> > ^^^^ And this is the root of the problem and what has to be fixed.
>
> I fixed that in patch one of this series.  Turns out the user of the
> kobject was not even expecting that to happen.
>
> > > when the call to kobject_uevent() happened, the parent walk to try to
> > > reconstruct the full path of the kobject could be a total mess and cause
> > > crashes.  It's not good to try to tear down a kobject tree from top
> > > down, but let's at least try to not to crash if a user does so.
> >
> > One can try, but if we keep proper reference counting then kobject
> > core should take care of actually releasing objects in the right
> > order. I do not think you should keep this patch, and instead see if
> > we can push call to kobject_put(kobj->parent) into kobject_cleanup().
>
> I tried that, but there was a _lot_ of underflow errors reported, so
> there's something else happening.  Or my attempt was incorrect :)

So it looks like there is something in there that's been overlooked so far.

I'll try to look at the Guenter's traces and figure out what went
wrong after the Heikki's patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ