[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0E1938E0-933D-4E04-993F-1E225B5BE0EA@flygoat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 17:14:08 +0800
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
CC: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] MIPS: Loongson64: Switch to generic PCI driver
于 2020年5月26日 GMT+08:00 下午5:12:27, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> 写到:
>On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:36:56AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:22:11PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:25:50PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>> > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:16:41PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>> > > > We can now enable generic PCI driver in Kconfig, and remove legacy
>> > > > PCI driver code.
>> > > >
>> > > > Radeon vbios quirk is moved to the platform folder to fit the
>> > > > new structure.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
>> > > > --
>> > > > v9: Fix licenses tag
>> > > > ---
>> > > > arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 +
>> > > > arch/mips/loongson64/Makefile | 2 +-
>> > > > arch/mips/loongson64/vbios_quirk.c | 29 ++++++++
>> > > > arch/mips/pci/Makefile | 1 -
>> > > > arch/mips/pci/fixup-loongson3.c | 71 ------------------
>> > > > arch/mips/pci/ops-loongson3.c | 116 -----------------------------
>> > > > 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
>> > > > create mode 100644 arch/mips/loongson64/vbios_quirk.c
>> > > > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pci/fixup-loongson3.c
>> > > > delete mode 100644 arch/mips/pci/ops-loongson3.c
>> > >
>> > > Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
>> >
>> > This patch (so the series) does not apply to v5.7-rc1 which is our
>> > baseline. I reiterate the point, isn't it better to take the whole
>> > series through the MIPS tree ?
>>
>> sounds better then
>>
>> > Failing that, the series has to
>> > be rebased (or split differently so that it can be taken through
>> > different trees), just let me know.
>>
>> so let's take via mips-next. So can I add your Acked-by to the
>> first three patches ?
>
>I have acked patch 2, you have all required ACKs to get this series via
>the MIPS tree now, apologies for the delay.
I had received a regression report from test robot.
Will send v11 very soon.
Please take v11 into MIPS tree.
Thanks.
>
>Thanks,
>Lorenzo
--
Jiaxun Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists