[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+rS=awLC_maPGjeWhh1Sb9U31xfvLecVe9sPTh83eDBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:35:06 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 01/16] dt: bindings: Add multicolor class dt bindings documention
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:39 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for reviews!
>
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +...
> > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
> >
> > This isn't a binding file. Belongs in another patch.
>
> These constants are directly related to the binding. It makes sense to
> go in one patch...
Yes, the header does go in this patch, but kernel subsystem files do not.
Part of the reason for separating is we generate a DT only repository
which filters out all the kernel code. Ideally this is just filtering
out commits and the commit messages still make sense.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists