linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v25 03/16] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d22658c2-07e2-74e6-dc2b-4b64fd9789dd@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 10:05:32 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 03/16] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx
 family of RGB drivers

Pavel

On 5/27/20 8:58 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> +          There can only be one instance of the ti,led-bank
>> +          property for each device node.  This is a required node is the LED
>> +          modules are to be backed.
> I don't understand the second sentence. Pretty sure it is not valid
> english.


If I make these changes is this still viable for 5.8 or would you then 
go into 5.9?

I mean v25 patchset was around for about 3+ weeks and now I have more 
changes.

Dan

>
> Best regards,
> 								Pavel
>