Message-ID: <20200527022539.GK991@lca.pw>
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 22:25:39 -0400
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, andi.kleen@...el.com,
        tim.c.chen@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] make vm_committed_as_batch aware of vm overcommit
 policy

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:46:47AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi Qian,
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:14:59PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:27:26PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:25:14PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > > When checking a performance change for will-it-scale scalability
> > > > mmap test [1], we found very high lock contention for spinlock of
> > > > percpu counter 'vm_committed_as':
> > > > 
> > > >     94.14%     0.35%  [kernel.kallsyms]         [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> > > >     48.21% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave;percpu_counter_add_batch;__vm_enough_memory;mmap_region;do_mmap;
> > > >     45.91% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave;percpu_counter_add_batch;__do_munmap;
> > > > 
> > > > Actually this heavy lock contention is not always necessary. The
> > > > 'vm_committed_as' needs to be very precise when the strict
> > > > OVERCOMMIT_NEVER policy is set, which requires a rather small batch
> > > > number for the percpu counter.
> > > > 
> > > > So lift the batch number to 16X for OVERCOMMIT_ALWAYS and
> > > > OVERCOMMIT_GUESS policies, and add a sysctl handler to adjust it
> > > > when the policy is reconfigured.
> > > > 
> > > > Benchmark with the same testcase in [1] shows 53% improvement on a
> > > > 8C/16T desktop, and 2097%(20X) on a 4S/72C/144T server. And no change
> > > > for some platforms, due to the test mmap size of the case is bigger
> > > > than the batch number computed, though the patch will help mmap/munmap
> > > > generally.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/5/57
> > > 
> > > Reverted this series fixed a warning under memory pressue.
> > 
> > Andrew, Stephen, can you drop this series?
> > 
> > > 
> > > [ 3319.257898] LTP: starting oom01
> > > [ 3319.284417] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 3319.284439] memory commitment underflow
> 
> Thanks for the catch!
> 
> Could you share the info about the platform, like the CPU numbers
> and RAM size, and what's the mmap test size of your test program.
> It would be great if you can point me the link to the test program.

I have been reproduced this on both AMD and Intel. The test just
allocating memory and swapping.

https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/overcommit_memory.c

It might be better to run the whole LTP mm tests if none of the above
triggers it for you which has quite a few memory pressurers.

/opt/ltp/runltp -f mm

# lscpu
Architecture:        x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):      32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:          Little Endian
CPU(s):              48
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-47
Thread(s) per core:  1
Core(s) per socket:  12
Socket(s):           4
NUMA node(s):        4
Vendor ID:           GenuineIntel
CPU family:          6
Model:               63
Model name:          Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4650 v3 @ 2.10GHz
Stepping:            2
CPU MHz:             1198.498
BogoMIPS:            4195.14
Virtualization:      VT-x
L1d cache:           32K
L1i cache:           32K
L2 cache:            256K
L3 cache:            30720K
NUMA node0 CPU(s):   0-5,24-29
NUMA node1 CPU(s):   6-11,30-35
NUMA node2 CPU(s):   12-17,36-41
NUMA node3 CPU(s):   18-23,42-47

# numactl -H
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 24 25 26 27 28 29
node 0 size: 27768 MB
node 0 free: 27539 MB
node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11 30 31 32 33 34 35
node 1 size: 32225 MB
node 1 free: 32009 MB
node 2 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17 36 37 38 39 40 41
node 2 size: 32253 MB
node 2 free: 32174 MB
node 3 cpus: 18 19 20 21 22 23 42 43 44 45 46 47
node 3 size: 32252 MB
node 3 free: 31330 MB
node distances:
node   0   1   2   3
  0:  10  21  21  21
  1:  21  10  21  21
  2:  21  21  10  21
  3:  21  21  21  10

> 
> Thanks,
> Feng
> 
> > > [ 3319.284456] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 130949 at mm/util.c:835 __vm_enough_memory+0x1dc/0x1f0
> > > [ 3319.284485] Modules linked in: brd ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 loop kvm_hv kvm ip_tables x_tables xfs sd_mod ahci libahci bnx2x libata mdio tg3 libphy firmware_class dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> > > [ 3319.284538] CPU: 13 PID: 130949 Comm: oom01 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6-next-20200521+ #115
> > > [ 3319.284551] NIP:  c00000000043027c LR: c000000000430278 CTR: c0000000007bd120
> > > [ 3319.284572] REGS: c00000064a42f710 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (5.7.0-rc6-next-20200521+)
> > > [ 3319.284602] MSR:  900000000282b033 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28222422  XER: 20040000
> > > [ 3319.284638] CFAR: c000000000119098 IRQMASK: 0 
> > >                GPR00: c000000000430278 c00000064a42f9a0 c000000001765500 000000000000001b 
> > >                GPR04: c00000000179c3b0 000000000000000b 0000000066726564 c00000000429ac28 
> > >                GPR08: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c000001301facc80 
> > >                GPR12: 0000000000002000 c000001fffff3d80 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 
> > >                GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000014f358dd60 fffffffffff7dfff 
> > >                GPR20: c0000003725a9128 c0000003725a3928 c000000b0a0c0670 c000000b0a0c0678 
> > >                GPR24: c000000b0a0c0660 c00000064a42fa58 c000000b0a0c0650 c0000003725a9080 
> > >                GPR28: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 c000000001620178 0000000000000001 
> > > [ 3319.284825] NIP [c00000000043027c] __vm_enough_memory+0x1dc/0x1f0
> > > [ 3319.284853] LR [c000000000430278] __vm_enough_memory+0x1d8/0x1f0
> > > [ 3319.284872] Call Trace:
> > > [ 3319.284889] [c00000064a42f9a0] [c000000000430278] __vm_enough_memory+0x1d8/0x1f0 (unreliable)
> > > [ 3319.284930] [c00000064a42fa30] [c000000000114258] dup_mm+0x2a8/0x700
> > > [ 3319.284960] [c00000064a42fae0] [c000000000115c7c] copy_process+0xeac/0x1a00
> > > [ 3319.284981] [c00000064a42fbf0] [c000000000116b3c] _do_fork+0xac/0xce0
> > > [ 3319.285002] [c00000064a42fd00] [c000000000117928] __do_sys_clone+0x98/0xe0
> > > [ 3319.285032] [c00000064a42fdc0] [c000000000039e78] system_call_exception+0x108/0x1d0
> > > [ 3319.285064] [c00000064a42fe20] [c00000000000c9f0] system_call_common+0xf0/0x278
> > > [ 3319.285093] Instruction dump:
> > > [ 3319.285109] 60000000 73a90001 4182000c e8be0002 4bfffeb8 3c62ff51 39200001 3d42fff9 
> > > [ 3319.285142] 38636690 992a6ad6 4bce8dbd 60000000 <0fe00000> e8be0002 4bfffe90 60000000 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists