[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR21MB15185419971A29EF52B8138FF7B10@MN2PR21MB1518.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 19:27:28 +0000
From: Steve MacLean <Steve.MacLean@...rosoft.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Steve MacLean <steve.maclean@...ux.microsoft.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v4] perf inject --jit: Remove //anon mmap
events
>> ** Implemented solution
>>
>> This patch solves the issue by removing // anon mmap events for any
>> process which has a valid jit-<pid>.dump file.
>>
>> It tracks on a per process basis to handle the case where some running
>> apps support jit-<pid>.dump, but some only support perf-<pid>.map.
>>
>> It adds new assumptions:
>> * // anon mmap events are only required for perf-<pid>.map support.
>> * An app that uses jit-<pid>.dump, no longer needs perf-<pid>.map
>> support. It assumes that any perf-<pid>.map info is inferior.
>>
>> *** Details
>>
>> Use thread->priv to store whether a jitdump file has been processed
>>
>> During "perf inject --jit", discard "//anon*" mmap events for any pid
>> which has sucessfully processed a jitdump file.
>
>
> Thanks Steve this is an important fix! As //anon could be for malloc or other uses, should the stripping behavior be behind a flag?
>
> Ian
I hadn't anticipated a need to preserve the //anon mmap events when profiling JIT generated code.
As far as I know mmap events are captured by perf only for mapping code to symbols. File mappings are kept
by the change. Only // anon mappings are stripped. (Only for processes which emitted jitdump files.)
And these are stripped only during the `perf inject --jit` step. I believe the // Anon mapping are only
generally useful for mapping JIT code.
I suppose if someone was trying to count mmap events it might be confusing, but `perf inject --jit` creates
synthetic mmap file events which would also make this scenario confusing.
I personally don't see a good reason to add a flag. I also don't see a simple way either. Not running `perf inject --jit`
would preserve existing behavior w/o jitdump support. Without stripping the anon events jitdump support is painfully
broken....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists