linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/5] perf/x86/rapl: make perf_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200527224659.206129-5-eranian@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 15:46:58 -0700
From:   Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, irogers@...gle.com,
        kim.phillips@....com, jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf/x86/rapl: make perf_probe_msr() more robust and flexible

This patch modifies perf_probe_msr() by allowing passing of
struct perf_msr array where some entries are not populated, i.e.,
they have either an msr address of 0 or no attribute_group pointer.
This helps with certain call paths, e.g., RAPL.

In case the grp is NULL, the default sysfs visibility rule
applies which is to make the group visible. Without the patch,
you would get a kernel crash with a NULL group.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/probe.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/probe.c b/arch/x86/events/probe.c
index c2ede2f3b2770..34ee0ee60ace8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/probe.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/probe.c
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ not_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * accepts msr[] array with non populated entries as long as either
+ * msr[i].msr is 0 or msr[i].grp is NULL. Note that the default sysfs
+ * visibility is visible when group->is_visible callback is set.
+ */
 unsigned long
 perf_msr_probe(struct perf_msr *msr, int cnt, bool zero, void *data)
 {
@@ -24,8 +29,16 @@ perf_msr_probe(struct perf_msr *msr, int cnt, bool zero, void *data)
 		if (!msr[bit].no_check) {
 			struct attribute_group *grp = msr[bit].grp;
 
+			/* skip entry with no group */
+			if (!grp)
+				continue;
+
 			grp->is_visible = not_visible;
 
+			/* skip unpopulated entry */
+			if (!msr[bit].msr)
+				continue;
+
 			if (msr[bit].test && !msr[bit].test(bit, data))
 				continue;
 			/* Virt sucks; you cannot tell if a R/O MSR is present :/ */
-- 
2.27.0.rc0.183.gde8f92d652-goog