[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200527225034.GA270348@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 17:50:34 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen-pciback: Use dev_printk() when possible
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:34:26PM -0700, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 5/27/20 1:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > @@ -155,8 +157,8 @@ int xen_pcibk_config_read(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset, int size,
> > u32 value = 0, tmp_val;
> >
> > if (unlikely(verbose_request))
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG DRV_NAME ": %s: read %d bytes at 0x%x\n",
> > - pci_name(dev), size, offset);
> > + dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "read %d bytes at 0x%x\n",
> > + size, offset);
>
>
> Maybe then dev_dbg() ?
printk(KERN_DEBUG) always produces output, so I used
dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) to retain that behavior.
dev_dbg() does not always produce output, since it depends on DEBUG or
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG and the dynamic debug settings.
If dev_dbg() seems like the right thing, I would probably add a
separate patch on top to convert dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) to dev_dbg().
Thanks for taking a look!
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists