[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159056213937.88029.2975519351515271642@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 23:48:59 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/91] clk: bcm: rpi: Make sure pllb_arm is removed
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-04-24 08:33:50)
> The pllb_arm clock was created at probe time, but was never removed if
> something went wrong later in probe, or if the driver was ever removed from
> the system.
>
> Now that we are using clk_hw_register, we can just use its managed variant
clk_hw_register()
> to take care of that for us.
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists