[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159056218564.88029.2045421244450515235@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 23:49:45 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/91] clk: bcm: rpi: Pass the clocks data to the firmware function
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-04-24 08:33:56)
> The raspberry_clock_property only takes the clock ID as an argument, but
> now that we have a clock data structure it makes more sense to just pass
> that structure instead.
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists