[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:20:45 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, drjones@...hat.com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to
kvm_vcpu_get_esr()
On 2020-05-27 03:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 5/26/20 8:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> Since kvm/arm32 was removed, this renames kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to
>>> kvm_vcpu_get_esr() to it a bit more self-explaining because the
>>> functions returns ESR instead of HSR on aarch64. This shouldn't
>>> cause any functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>>
>> I think that this would be a nice cleanup on its own, and could be
>> taken
>> independently of the rest of this series if it were rebased and sent
>> as
>> a single patch.
>>
>
> Yeah, I'll see how PATCH[3,4,5] can be posted independently
> as part of the preparatory work, which is suggested by you
> in another reply.
>
> By the way, I assume the cleanup patches are good enough to
> target 5.8.rc1/rc2 if you agree.
It's fine to base them on -rc1 or -rc2. They will not be merged
before 5.9 though.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists