linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] kobject: send KOBJ_REMOVE uevent when the object is removed from sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 16:03:49 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kobject: send KOBJ_REMOVE uevent when the object is
 removed from sysfs

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:56 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 5/28/20 3:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:25 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:01:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So Guenter, can you please test the patch below to see if it still introduces
> >>> the problems seen by you on ARM?
> >>>
> >>
> >> arm64 and arm64be boot tests pass with the patch below.
> >
> > Great, thanks!
> >
> >> Some arm boot tests fail, but I think that is due to some other problem with -next.
> >> Hard to say for sure at this point because -next is pretty badly broken
> >> overall. I'll need to run some bisects to see what is going on.
> >
> > I see.
> >
>
> The failing arm boot tests are due to various dts changes (commit "arm64:
> dts: vexpress: Move fixed devices out of bus node" and associated),
> unrelated to this patch.

Thanks for the confirmation!