[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i+Kz9U7EHx-KMiqpKnzdbNc-u0gMZ7v0=fGDcqKa28vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:03:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kobject: send KOBJ_REMOVE uevent when the object is
removed from sysfs
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:56 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 5/28/20 3:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:25 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:01:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So Guenter, can you please test the patch below to see if it still introduces
> >>> the problems seen by you on ARM?
> >>>
> >>
> >> arm64 and arm64be boot tests pass with the patch below.
> >
> > Great, thanks!
> >
> >> Some arm boot tests fail, but I think that is due to some other problem with -next.
> >> Hard to say for sure at this point because -next is pretty badly broken
> >> overall. I'll need to run some bisects to see what is going on.
> >
> > I see.
> >
>
> The failing arm boot tests are due to various dts changes (commit "arm64:
> dts: vexpress: Move fixed devices out of bus node" and associated),
> unrelated to this patch.
Thanks for the confirmation!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists