[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f45de43-af43-24da-b7d3-00b9d2bd517c@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 23:40:26 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Call kvm_x86_ops.cpuid_update() after CPUIDs
fully updated
On 5/28/2020 11:22 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/05/20 17:19, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> kvm_x86_ops.cpuid_update() is used to update vmx/svm settings based on
>> updated CPUID settings. So it's supposed to be called after CPUIDs are
>> fully updated, not in the middle stage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>
> Are you seeing anything bad happening from this?
Not yet.
IMO changing the order is more reasonable and less confusing.
> Paolo
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index cd708b0b460a..753739bc1bf0 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -208,8 +208,11 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent = cpuid->nent;
>> cpuid_fix_nx_cap(vcpu);
>> kvm_apic_set_version(vcpu);
>> - kvm_x86_ops.cpuid_update(vcpu);
>> r = kvm_update_cpuid(vcpu);
>> + if (r)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + kvm_x86_ops.cpuid_update(vcpu);
>>
>> out:
>> vfree(cpuid_entries);
>> @@ -231,8 +234,11 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_cpuid2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> goto out;
>> vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent = cpuid->nent;
>> kvm_apic_set_version(vcpu);
>> - kvm_x86_ops.cpuid_update(vcpu);
>> r = kvm_update_cpuid(vcpu);
>> + if (r)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + kvm_x86_ops.cpuid_update(vcpu);
>> out:
>> return r;
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists