linux-kernel - Re: Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hblm8lyz0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 20:02:27 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc:     "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Silviu Vlasceanu" <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options

On Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:55 +0200,
Roberto Sassu wrote:
> 
> > From: linux-integrity-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Takashi Iwai
> > On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:35:16 +0200,
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Roberto,
> > >
> > > it seems that the recent changes in IMA in linux-next caused a
> > > regression: namely it triggers an Oops when booting with the options
> > >   ima_policy=tcb ima_template_fmt='d-ng|n-ng|d|ng'
> > 
> > And further experiment revealed that passing only ima_template_fmt=d
> > is enough for triggering the bug.  Other formats don't matter.
> > 
> > (snip)
> > > It's a KVM instance without any TPM stuff, just passed the options
> > > above.  I could trigger the same bug on a bare metal, too.
> > >
> > > Then I performed bisection and it spotted the commit:
> > > 6f1a1d103b48b1533a9c804e7a069e2c8e937ce7
> > >   ima: Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate
> > >
> > > Actually reverting this commit fixed the Oops again.
> > 
> > So, looking at the fact above (triggered by "d") and this bisection
> > result, it seems that the issue is specific to ima_eventdigest_init().
> > The difference from others is that this has a check by
> > ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(), and currently the check allows only
> > SHA1 and MD5, while now SHA256 is assigned as default.  So I tested
> > adding SHA256 there like below, and it seems working.
> > 
> > Hopefully I'm heading to a right direction...
> 
> Hi Takashi
> 
> boot_aggregate is the only entry for which there is no file descriptor.
> The file descriptor is used to recalculate the digest if it is not SHA1
> or MD5. For boot_aggregate, we should use instead
> ima_calc_boot_aggregate(). I will provide a patch.
> 
> I see that the .file member of event_data in
> ima_add_boot_aggregate() is not initialized. Can you please try
> to set .file to NULL?

Tested and it didn't help.  The field was already zero-initialized via
C99-style initialization, I believe.


thanks,

Takashi

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Roberto
> 
> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
> Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli
> 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > Takashi
> > 
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
> > 
> >  static bool ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(u8 algo)
> >  {
> > -	if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1 || algo == HASH_ALGO_MD5)
> > +	if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1 || algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA256 ||
> > +	    algo == HASH_ALGO_MD5)
> >  		return true;
> > 
> >  	return false;
>