linux-kernel - RE: Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22f1132ebc9d4c2e8fc354efb1845984@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 07:33:34 +0000
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:     "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Silviu Vlasceanu" <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options

> From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@...e.de]
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:55 +0200,
> Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >
> > > From: linux-integrity-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> > > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Takashi Iwai
> > > On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:35:16 +0200,
> > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Roberto,
> > > >
> > > > it seems that the recent changes in IMA in linux-next caused a
> > > > regression: namely it triggers an Oops when booting with the options
> > > >   ima_policy=tcb ima_template_fmt='d-ng|n-ng|d|ng'
> > >
> > > And further experiment revealed that passing only
> ima_template_fmt=d
> > > is enough for triggering the bug.  Other formats don't matter.
> > >
> > > (snip)
> > > > It's a KVM instance without any TPM stuff, just passed the options
> > > > above.  I could trigger the same bug on a bare metal, too.
> > > >
> > > > Then I performed bisection and it spotted the commit:
> > > > 6f1a1d103b48b1533a9c804e7a069e2c8e937ce7
> > > >   ima: Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate
> > > >
> > > > Actually reverting this commit fixed the Oops again.
> > >
> > > So, looking at the fact above (triggered by "d") and this bisection
> > > result, it seems that the issue is specific to ima_eventdigest_init().
> > > The difference from others is that this has a check by
> > > ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(), and currently the check allows only
> > > SHA1 and MD5, while now SHA256 is assigned as default.  So I tested
> > > adding SHA256 there like below, and it seems working.
> > >
> > > Hopefully I'm heading to a right direction...
> >
> > Hi Takashi
> >
> > boot_aggregate is the only entry for which there is no file descriptor.
> > The file descriptor is used to recalculate the digest if it is not SHA1
> > or MD5. For boot_aggregate, we should use instead
> > ima_calc_boot_aggregate(). I will provide a patch.
> >
> > I see that the .file member of event_data in
> > ima_add_boot_aggregate() is not initialized. Can you please try
> > to set .file to NULL?
> 
> Tested and it didn't help.  The field was already zero-initialized via
> C99-style initialization, I believe.

Found the issue.

ima_evendigest_init() returns an error and after that IMA is not
initialized. Unfortunately, ima_must_appraise() does not check
ima_policy_flag, so the kernel crashes when ima_match_policy()
tries to evaluate the policy which is not loaded (ima_rules = NULL).

if you add at the beginning of ima_must_appraise()

if (!ima_policy_flag)
	return 0;

the kernel should not crash.

Roberto

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli

> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> > HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
> > Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli
> >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Takashi
> > >
> > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
> > > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
> > > @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
> > >
> > >  static bool ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(u8 algo)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1 || algo == HASH_ALGO_MD5)
> > > +	if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1 || algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA256 ||
> > > +	    algo == HASH_ALGO_MD5)
> > >  		return true;
> > >
> > >  	return false;
> >