[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528224835.GU2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 00:48:35 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@...il.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/entry: disallow #DB more
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:42:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:25 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > These patches disallow #DB during NMI/#MC and allow removing a lot of fugly code.
> >
> 
> Hello
> 
> Will #DB be allowed in #DF?
No, that whole thing is noinstr.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
