linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/entry: disallow #DB more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJhGHyAZVVyQx_3gEtcxF_NaOov4=oR9kN4qO4FAR==hTNa+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 07:05:54 +0800
From:   Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/entry: disallow #DB more

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:48 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:42:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:25 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > These patches disallow #DB during NMI/#MC and allow removing a lot of fugly code.
> > >
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > Will #DB be allowed in #DF?
>
> No, that whole thing is noinstr.

But it calls many functions, including die(), panic().
We don't want #DB to interfere how it die() and panic().
Since it is in fragile #DF, the #DB may mess it up and
make #DF fails to report and die.