[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <015401d634ad$4628e4c0$d27aae40$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 14:03:06 +0900
From: "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To: "'Tetsuhiro Kohada'" <kohada.t2@...il.com>
Cc: <kohada.tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<mori.takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
"'Sungjong Seo'" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
"'Namjae Jeon'" <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
> >> II tried applying patch to dev-tree (4c4dbb6ad8e8).
> >> -The .patch file I sent
> >> -mbox file downloaded from archive
> >> But I can't reproduce the error. (Both succeed) How do you reproduce
> >> the error?
> > I tried to appy your patches in the following order.
> > 1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
> > 2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector 3. [PATCH 2/4]
> > exfat: separate the boot sector analysis 4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add
> > boot region verification 5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum
> > calculation
>
> I was able to reproduce it.
>
> The dir-cache patch was created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
> The 4 patches for boot_sector were also created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
> (at physically separated place)
>
> I'm sorry I didn't check any conflicts with these patches.
>
> I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
> If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?
I will apply them after testing at once if you send updated 5 patches again.
Thanks!
>
> BR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists