[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccb66f50-b275-4717-f165-98390520077b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:00:58 +0900
From: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@...il.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
kohada.tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
mori.takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
>> II tried applying patch to dev-tree (4c4dbb6ad8e8).
>> -The .patch file I sent
>> -mbox file downloaded from archive
>> But I can't reproduce the error. (Both succeed)
>> How do you reproduce the error?
> I tried to appy your patches in the following order.
> 1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
> 2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector
> 3. [PATCH 2/4] exfat: separate the boot sector analysis
> 4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add boot region verification
> 5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
I was able to reproduce it.
The dir-cache patch was created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
The 4 patches for boot_sector were also created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
(at physically separated place)
I'm sorry I didn't check any conflicts with these patches.
I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?
BR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists