lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 11:00:58 +0900
From:   Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@...il.com>
To:     Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        kohada.tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        mori.takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation

>> II tried applying patch to dev-tree (4c4dbb6ad8e8).
>> -The .patch file I sent
>> -mbox file downloaded from archive
>> But I can't reproduce the error. (Both succeed)
>> How do you reproduce the error?
> I tried to appy your patches in the following order.
> 1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
> 2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector
> 3. [PATCH 2/4] exfat: separate the boot sector analysis
> 4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add boot region verification
> 5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation

I was able to reproduce it.

The dir-cache patch was created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
The 4 patches for boot_sector were also created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
(at physically separated place)

I'm sorry I didn't check any conflicts with these patches.

I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?

BR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists