[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200528091528.0ef4bbbc@xps13>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 09:15:28 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the nand
tree
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote on Thu, 28 May 2020
14:52:05 +1000:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> 1777341d9335 ("dt-bindings: mtd: Deprecate OOB_FIRST mode")
>
> from the nand tree and commit:
>
> 3d21a4609335 ("dt-bindings: Remove cases of 'allOf' containing a '$ref'")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
My change can wait, it's part of a preparation series for a bigger
rework that will come with 5.9 so I'll drop the patch for this release.
I already carry a much bigger release than usual, I don't want to
bother with merge conflicts. Thanks for the fix though!
Cheers,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists