linux-kernel - 回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB3257D6E7E93A518392502809FF8E0@DM6PR11MB3257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 01:44:43 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
To:     Markus Elfring <markus.elfring@....de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

Thanks for your guide.
I will try to change the weakness of weak wording.

________________________________________
发件人: Zhang, Qiang <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
发送时间: 2020年5月28日 9:41
收件人: Markus Elfring; Tejun Heo; Lai Jiangshan
抄送: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
主题: 回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

Thanks for your guide. I tried to change the weakness of weak wording


________________________________
发件人: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org> 代表 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
发送时间: 2020年5月27日 16:20
收件人: Zhang, Qiang <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>; Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>; Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
抄送: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
主题: Re: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.
…
> Suggested-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>

Would the tag “Co-developed-by” be more appropriate according to the patch review
to achieve a more pleasing commit message?


>  v1->v2->v3->v4->v5:
>  Modify weakly submitted information.

Now I wonder about your wording choice “weakly”.

Regards,
Markus