[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529170231.GB1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 18:02:32 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: Enable autoneg bypass for
1000BaseX/2500BaseX ports
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:25:04PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I wonder how much risk there is to changing that, so we force the link
> > down if phylink says the link should be down, otherwise we force the
> > speed/duplex, disable AN, and allow the link to come up depending on
> > the serdes status. It /sounds/ like something sane to do.
>
> Hi Russell
>
> I actually did this for mv88e6xxx in a patchset for ZII devel B. It
> was determining link based on SFP LOS, which we know is unreliable. It
> said there was link even when the SERDES had lost link.
>
> I did it by making use of the fixed-link state call back, since it was
> a quick and dirty patch. But it might make more sense for the MAC to
> call phylink_mac_change() for change in PCS state? Or add a PCS
> specific.
Correct. In the early phylink versions, I did have sync state reported
from the PCS back to phylink, but as phylink didn't make use of it, I
removed it as it wasn't obvious how it should be used.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists