[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200602100826.72465faaab5f013e08851dfe@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:08:26 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: Enable autoneg bypass for
1000BaseX/2500BaseX ports
On Fri, 29 May 2020 18:33:40 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > > By propagated, you mean if the external link is down, the link between
> > > the switch and node 1 will also be forced down, at the SERDES level?
> >
> > yes
> >
> > > And if external ports are down, the nodes cannot talk to each other?
> >
> > correct
> >
> > > External link down causes the whole in box network to fall apart? That
> > > seems a rather odd design.
> >
> > as I'm not an expert in ceph, I can't judge. But I'll bring it up.
>
> I guess for a single use appliance this is O.K. But it makes the
> hardware unusable as a general purpose server.
>
> Is there a variant of the hardware to be used as a general purpose
> server, rather than as a Ceph appliance? If so, does it share the same
> DT files?
I don't know of any, but it would just need some way to change the switch
configuration. So it's independent from linux running on the nodes.
Thomas.
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists