[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82608FDB-FEF8-45FA-85D7-236B46F906B7@flygoat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 12:36:41 +0800
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: Loongson64: Initial LS7A PCH support
于 2020年5月29日 GMT+08:00 下午12:13:36, Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com> 写到:
>Hi, Jiaxun,
>
>On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:45 AM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com> wrote:
>>
>> With this series, LS7A and Loongson-3A4000 is finally supported
>> note that this series should depend on irqchip support[1], which
>> is likely to get merged soon.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/16/72
>>
>> Jiaxun Yang (3):
>> dt-bindings: mips: Document two Loongson generic boards
>> MIPS: Loongson64: DeviceTree for LS7A PCH
>> MIPS: Loongson64:Load LS7A dtbs
>>
>> .../bindings/mips/loongson/devices.yaml | 8 +
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/Makefile | 5 +-
>> .../dts/loongson/loongson3-r4-package.dtsi | 74 +++++++
>> .../dts/loongson/loongson3_4core_ls7a.dts | 25 +++
>> .../boot/dts/loongson/loongson3_r4_ls7a.dts | 10 +
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi | 185 ++++++++++++++++++
>> .../asm/mach-loongson64/builtin_dtbs.h | 2 +
>> arch/mips/loongson64/env.c | 56 +++---
>> 8 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson3-r4-package.dtsi
>> create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson3_4core_ls7a.dts
>> create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson3_r4_ls7a.dts
>> create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi
>I think the naming can be like this: Old processor (Loongson 3A R1~R3)
>use loongson64c_ prefix instead of loongson3, new processor (Loongson
>3A R4) use loongson64g_ prefix instead of loongson3_r4, and
>Loongson-2K use loongson64r_ prefix, this makes them consistent with
>their PRID definitions.
DeviceTree bindings have stable ABI. Although they're currently
only used internally in Kernel. I don't think it's a good idea
to rename existing bindings.
Also, Loongson64C/64G/64R never came to a part of Loongson's
official naming. I doubt if end users will recognize these names.
I'd prefer keep naming as is. It's really not a big deal.
Thanks.
>
>>
>> --
>> 2.27.0.rc0
>>
--
Jiaxun Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists