linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200529204942.0edf6cf6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 20:49:42 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:

  mm/swap.c

between commit:

  b01b21419999 ("mm/swap: Use local_lock for protection")

from the tip tree and patch:

  "mm/swap.c: annotate data races for lru_rotate_pvecs"

from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index a8442ed0bb16..936d6b545217 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -620,7 +620,8 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
 		__pagevec_lru_add(pvec);
 
 	pvec = &per_cpu(lru_rotate.pvec, cpu);
-	if (pagevec_count(pvec)) {
+	/* Disabling interrupts below acts as a compiler barrier. */
+	if (data_race(pagevec_count(pvec))) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		/* No harm done if a racing interrupt already did this */
@@ -781,7 +782,7 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void)
 		struct work_struct *work = &per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu);
 
 		if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_add, cpu)) ||
-		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.pvec, cpu)) ||
+		    data_race(pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.pvec, cpu))) ||
 		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_deactivate_file, cpu)) ||
 		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_deactivate, cpu)) ||
 		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_lazyfree, cpu)) ||

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped