[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529105009.GH1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:50:09 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] dmaengine: dw: Initialize min_burst capability
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:41:19PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:29:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:23:59AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
...
> > > > /* DMA capabilities */
> > > > + dw->dma.min_burst = 1;
> > >
> > > Perhaps then relaxed maximum, like
> > >
> > > dw->dma.max_burst = 256;
> > >
> > > (channels will update this)
> > >
> > > ?
>
> > And forgot to mention that perhaps we need a definitions for both.
>
> By "definitions for both" do you mean a macro with corresponding parameter
> definition like it's done for the max burst length in the next patch?
> Something like this:
> --- include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
> +++ include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
> +#define DW_DMA_MIN_BURST 1
> +#define DW_DMA_MAX_BURST 256
>
> ?
Yes!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists