[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529105109.oswi2touyin5ir66@mobilestation>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:51:09 +0300
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] dmaengine: dw: Initialize min_burst capability
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:50:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:41:19PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:29:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:23:59AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > > /* DMA capabilities */
> > > > > + dw->dma.min_burst = 1;
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps then relaxed maximum, like
> > > >
> > > > dw->dma.max_burst = 256;
> > > >
> > > > (channels will update this)
> > > >
> > > > ?
> >
> > > And forgot to mention that perhaps we need a definitions for both.
> >
> > By "definitions for both" do you mean a macro with corresponding parameter
> > definition like it's done for the max burst length in the next patch?
> > Something like this:
> > --- include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
> > +++ include/linux/platform_data/dma-dw.h
> > +#define DW_DMA_MIN_BURST 1
> > +#define DW_DMA_MAX_BURST 256
> >
> > ?
>
> Yes!
Ok. Good idea. I'll do that. Thanks.
-Sergey
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists