[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200530094338.GE1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 10:43:38 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: cumana_2: Fix different dev_id between
'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
> So use 'host' in both cases.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
This is itself wrong. cumanascsi_2_intr() requires "info" as the devid.
Either cumanascsi_2_intr() needs changing to use shost_priv(host) along
with this change, or free_irq() needs changing to use "info".
Likely the same for the other patches, I haven't looked.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists