[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd729c13-fbc8-22e7-7d8e-e3e126f66943@web.de>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 10:03:19 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/clk/gm20b: Fix memory leak in gm20b_clk_new()
> When gk20a_clk_ctor() returns an error code, pointer "clk"
> should be released.
Such an information is reasonable.
> It's the same when gm20b_clk_new() returns from elsewhere following this call.
I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more.
Can it be that the allocated clock object should be kept usable even after
a successful return from this function?
Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists