[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40d8fb01.db721.17269d3d620.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:23:10 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
To: "Markus Elfring" <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>, "Kangjie Lu" <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/clk/gm20b: Fix memory leak in
gm20b_clk_new()
>
> > It's the same when gm20b_clk_new() returns from elsewhere following this call.
>
> I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more.
> Can it be that the allocated clock object should be kept usable even after
> a successful return from this function?
>
It's possible that we expect an usable clk pointer, though I could not find
the exact usage yet. For security, I will release this pointer only on error
paths in this function.
>
> Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
>
Thank you for your advice! I will add this tag in the next version of patch.
Regards,
Dinghao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists