[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a28fd20e-1f9e-d070-4d2e-2bee89f39154@web.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 20:04:50 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2] afs: Fix memory leak in afs_put_sysnames()
> Perhaps something like:
>
> Fix afs_put_sysnames() to actually free the specified afs_sysnames
> object after its reference count has been decreased to zero and its
> contents have been released.
* How do you think about to omit the word "Fix" because of the provided tag?
* Is freeing and releasing an item a duplicate operation anyhow?
>> Will it matter to mention the size of the data structure "afs_sysnames"?
>
> Why is it necessary to do so?
I suggest to express the impact of the missed function call "kfree".
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists