linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] regmap: fix alignment issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <159101243960.15463.7213725042081680986.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:53:59 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jens Thoms Toerring <jt@...rring.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] regmap: fix alignment issue

On Sun, 31 May 2020 11:53:00 +0200, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
> The assembly and disassembly of data to be sent to or received from
> a device invoke functions regmap_format_XX() and regmap_parse_XX()
> that extract or insert data items from or into a buffer, using
> assignments. In some cases the functions are called with a buffer
> pointer with an odd address. On architectures with strict alignment
> requirements this can result in a kernel crash. The assignments
> have been replaced by functions that take alignment into account.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: fix alignment issue
      commit: 53d860952c8215cf9ae1ea33409c8cb71ad6ad3d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark