lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159101243960.15463.1377112309975182507.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:54:04 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jens Thoms Toerring <jt@...rring.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regmap: fix alignment issue

On Fri, 29 May 2020 21:25:38 +0200, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
> The assembly and disassembly of data to be sent to or received from a
> device invoke functions (regmap_format_XXX() and regmap_parse_XXX())
> that extract or insert data items from or into a buffer, using
> assignments. In some cases those functions are called with buffer
> pointers with odd addresses. On architectures with strict alignment
> requirements this results in a kernel crash for u16 and u32 values.
> The assignments have been replaced by methods that take alignment
> into consideration.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: fix alignment issue
      commit: 53d860952c8215cf9ae1ea33409c8cb71ad6ad3d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ