lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200601002520.hajvtpefi7yzvmuq@smtp.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 31 May 2020 20:25:20 -0400
From:   Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>
To:     Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc:     Sidong Yang <realwakka@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vkms: Optimize compute_crc(), blend()

Hi,

First of all, thanks a lot for all your patch. And thanks Emil for your
feedback.

I have a suggestion here:

Emil:
Could you give me your Acked-by or maybe Reviewed-by for the writeback
series? With that, I can finally apply the series.

Sidong:
Secondly, after applying the writeback series, I would suggest you to
understand Emil's comments (he already provides the link) and prepare a
new patch based on that. Before you submit your patch, I recommend you
to test it with https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68352/ and
kms_flip.

How about that?

Best Regards

On 05/31, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 14:12, Sidong Yang <realwakka@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Optimize looping pixels in compute_crc() and blend(). Calculate
> > src_offset in start of looping horizontally and increase it.
> > It's better than calculating in every pixels.
> >
> When you say "optimize" have you observed any actual benefits of the
> patch - be that smaller binary, faster execution time, etc?
> If there are - mentioned them in the commit message. Otherwise, it
> doesn't optimise anything.
> 
> A while back, I've suggested something similar [1] mostly for cosmetic
> purposes - doubt there's much benefits beyond that.
> 
> HTH
> -Emil
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/365177/#comment_674314

-- 
Rodrigo Siqueira
https://siqueira.tech

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ