[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200602200436.GA6535@amd>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 22:04:36 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 01/16] dt: bindings: Add multicolor class dt bindings
documention
On Wed 2020-05-27 08:35:06, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:39 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thanks for reviews!
> >
> > > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > > +...
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
> > >
> > > This isn't a binding file. Belongs in another patch.
> >
> > These constants are directly related to the binding. It makes sense to
> > go in one patch...
>
> Yes, the header does go in this patch, but kernel subsystem files do not.
>
> Part of the reason for separating is we generate a DT only repository
> which filters out all the kernel code. Ideally this is just filtering
> out commits and the commit messages still make sens
Well, but the patch can't be split like that. Otherwise we risk null
pointer dereferences when one part is applied but not the second one.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists