linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v25 01/16] dt: bindings: Add multicolor class dt bindings documention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLaycpi4EtXK-7GV49fm0GbPmPsrNwz2WSBFFO_zdQG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:44:32 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 01/16] dt: bindings: Add multicolor class dt bindings documention

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:04 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> On Wed 2020-05-27 08:35:06, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:39 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Thanks for reviews!
> > >
> > > > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > > > +...
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
> > > >
> > > > This isn't a binding file. Belongs in another patch.
> > >
> > > These constants are directly related to the binding. It makes sense to
> > > go in one patch...
> >
> > Yes, the header does go in this patch, but kernel subsystem files do not.
> >
> > Part of the reason for separating is we generate a DT only repository
> > which filters out all the kernel code. Ideally this is just filtering
> > out commits and the commit messages still make sens
>
> Well, but the patch can't be split like that. Otherwise we risk null
> pointer dereferences when one part is applied but not the second one.

There's no risk because you are supposed to apply both patches. I
don't apply binding patches that are a part of a series like this.

Rob