[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26028f50-3fb8-eb08-3c9f-08ada018bf9e@web.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:40:33 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get
failure
> The counter is incremented via pm_runtime_get even in failure case.
> To correct the counter call pm_runtime_put in case of failure, too.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Change description:
The PM runtime reference counter is generally incremented by a call of
the function “pm_runtime_get_sync”.
Thus call the function “pm_runtime_put_autosuspend” also in one error case
to keep the reference counting consistent.
Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists