linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/clk/gm20b: Fix memory leak in gm20b_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65e3d2b7-b0ad-f387-b8fe-d83ea816a0f6@web.de>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:10:34 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/clk/gm20b: Fix memory leak in gm20b_clk_new()

> The original patch was basically fine.

I propose to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more.

* Should the allocated clock object be kept usable even after
  a successful return from this function?

* How much do “destructor” calls matter here for (sub)devices?


> Just add a Fixes tag and resend.

This tag can help also.

Regards,
Markus