[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200602153900.GW22511@kadam>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:39:00 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/clk/gm20b: Fix memory leak in gm20b_clk_new()
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The original patch was basically fine.
>
> I propose to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more.
>
> * Should the allocated clock object be kept usable even after
> a successful return from this function?
Heh. You're right. The patch is freeing "clk" on the success path so
that doesn't work.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists