linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] Rework READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:52:20 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Talking off-list, Clang >= 7 is pretty reasonable wrt inlining decisions
> and the behaviour for __always_inline is:
> 
>   * An __always_inline function inlined into a __no_sanitize function is
>     not instrumented
>   * An __always_inline function inlined into an instrumented function is
>     instrumented
>   * You can't mark a function as both __always_inline __no_sanitize, because
>     __no_sanitize functions are never inlined
> 
> GCC, on the other hand, may still inline __no_sanitize functions and then
> subsequently instrument them.

Yeah, about that: I've been looking for a way to trigger this so that
I can show preprocessed source to gcc people. So do you guys have a
.config or somesuch I can try?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette