[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200603192353.GA180529@google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 21:23:53 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen
On Wed, 03 Jun 2020, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Talking off-list, Clang >= 7 is pretty reasonable wrt inlining decisions
> > and the behaviour for __always_inline is:
> >
> > * An __always_inline function inlined into a __no_sanitize function is
> > not instrumented
> > * An __always_inline function inlined into an instrumented function is
> > instrumented
> > * You can't mark a function as both __always_inline __no_sanitize, because
> > __no_sanitize functions are never inlined
> >
> > GCC, on the other hand, may still inline __no_sanitize functions and then
> > subsequently instrument them.
>
> Yeah, about that: I've been looking for a way to trigger this so that
> I can show preprocessed source to gcc people. So do you guys have a
> .config or somesuch I can try?
For example take this:
int x;
static inline __attribute__((no_sanitize_thread)) void do_not_sanitize(void) {
x++;
}
void sanitize_this(void) {
do_not_sanitize();
}
Then
gcc-10 -O3 -fsanitize=thread -o example.o -c example.c
objdump -D example.o
will show that do_not_sanitize() was inlined into sanitize_this() and is
instrumented. (With Clang this doesn't happen.)
Hope this is enough.
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists