linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200603190306.bd85ea37629210c8642f7bd7@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:03:06 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 kselftest tree

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:29:01 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   eee470e0739a ("selftests/sysctl: Fix to load test_sysctl module")
> 
> from the kselftest tree and patch:
> 
>   "tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh: support CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=y"
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thank you for fixing this confliction, at least this fix looks good to me.
I think this (Vlatimil's patch) should be merged via Shuah's kselftest tree.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/27/921

This fix seems an independent fix.

Thank you,

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> index c3459f9f2429,ce1eeea6f769..000000000000
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> @@@ -112,10 -122,9 +112,10 @@@ test_reqs(
>   
>   function load_req_mod()
>   {
> - 	if [ ! -d $DIR ]; then
> + 	if [ ! -d $DIR -a ! -d $SYSCTL ]; then
>   		if ! modprobe -q -n $TEST_DRIVER; then
> - 			echo "$0: module $TEST_DRIVER not found [SKIP]"
> + 			echo "$0: module $TEST_DRIVER not found and not built-in [SKIP]"
>  +			echo "You must set CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=m in your kernel" >&2
>   			exit $ksft_skip
>   		fi
>   		modprobe $TEST_DRIVER


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>