linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0137f4b2-78cb-bd87-056a-aa44ac474637@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:38:01 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 kselftest tree

On 6/3/20 4:03 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:29:01 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>    tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>    eee470e0739a ("selftests/sysctl: Fix to load test_sysctl module")
>>
>> from the kselftest tree and patch:
>>
>>    "tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh: support CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=y"
>>
>> from the akpm-current tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
> 
> Thank you for fixing this confliction, at least this fix looks good to me.
> I think this (Vlatimil's patch) should be merged via Shuah's kselftest tree.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/27/921
> 
> This fix seems an independent fix.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
>>
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
>> index c3459f9f2429,ce1eeea6f769..000000000000
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
>> @@@ -112,10 -122,9 +112,10 @@@ test_reqs(
>>    
>>    function load_req_mod()
>>    {
>> - 	if [ ! -d $DIR ]; then
>> + 	if [ ! -d $DIR -a ! -d $SYSCTL ]; then
>>    		if ! modprobe -q -n $TEST_DRIVER; then
>> - 			echo "$0: module $TEST_DRIVER not found [SKIP]"
>> + 			echo "$0: module $TEST_DRIVER not found and not built-in [SKIP]"
>>   +			echo "You must set CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=m in your kernel" >&2
>>    			exit $ksft_skip
>>    		fi
>>    		modprobe $TEST_DRIVER
> 
> 

Thanks Stephen for the fixup and Masami for verifying this looks good.
Please carry the fix. I will make a note of the fix in my pull request
to Linus as well to keep us all on the same page.

thanks,
-- Shuah