[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsyGmJYHJr8rmRTxScYGyNQ1ZdPMxprW1zoQmGhXg1wuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:25:04 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ovl: fix null pointer dereference on null stack
pointer on error return
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:15 PM Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2020 17:11, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:46 PM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >>
> >> There are two error return paths where the call to path_put is
> >> dereferencing the null pointer 'stack'. Fix this by avoiding the
> >> error exit path via label 'out_err' that will lead to the path_put
> >> calls and instead just return the error code directly.
> >>
> >> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference after null check)"
> >> Fixes: 4155c10a0309 ("ovl: clean up getting lower layers")
> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> >
> > Which branch is that based on?
> > Doesn't seem to apply to master nor next
>
> It was based on today's linux-next
Yeah, it's actually
Fixes: 73819e26c0f0 ("ovl: get rid of redundant members in struct ovl_fs")
So I'll just fold your patch. There's still a change in the loop
count for later errors, but that's okay, since
ovl_lower_dir()/ovl_mount_dir_noesc() use the path_put_init() variant.
Actually ovl_lower_dir() can get rid of that path_put_init()
completely, since now the only caller will take care of that...
Thanks for reporting!
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists