[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200604094133.GC202650@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:41:33 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable
pagefault/preempt twice
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:44:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> sparc32 smp images in next-20200603 still crash for me with a spinlock
> recursion. s390 images hang early in boot. Several others (alpha, arm64,
> various ppc) don't even compile. I can run some more bisects over time,
> but this is becoming a full-time job :-(.
I've been able to bisect s390 hang to commit b614345f52bc ("x86/entry:
Clarify irq_{enter,exit}_rcu()").
After this commit, lockdep_hardirq_exit() is called twice on s390 (and
others) - one time in irq_exit_rcu() and another one in irq_exit():
/**
* irq_exit_rcu() - Exit an interrupt context without updating RCU
*
* Also processes softirqs if needed and possible.
*/
void irq_exit_rcu(void)
{
__irq_exit_rcu();
/* must be last! */
lockdep_hardirq_exit();
}
/**
* irq_exit - Exit an interrupt context, update RCU and lockdep
*
* Also processes softirqs if needed and possible.
*/
void irq_exit(void)
{
irq_exit_rcu();
rcu_irq_exit();
/* must be last! */
lockdep_hardirq_exit();
}
Removing the call in irq_exit() make s390 boot again, and judgung by the
x86 entry code, the comment /* must be last! */ is stale...
@Peter, @Thomas, can you comment please?
>From e51d50ee6f4d1f446decf91c2c67230da14ff82c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:37:03 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] softirq: don't call lockdep_hardirq_exit() twice
After commit b614345f52bc ("x86/entry: Clarify irq_{enter,exit}_rcu()")
lockdep_hardirq_exit() is called twice on every architecture that uses
irq_exit(): one time in irq_exit_rcu() and another one in irq_exit().
Remove the extra call in irq_exit().
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index a3eb6eba8c41..7523f4ce4c1d 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static inline void __irq_exit_rcu(void)
void irq_exit_rcu(void)
{
__irq_exit_rcu();
- /* must be last! */
lockdep_hardirq_exit();
}
@@ -440,8 +439,6 @@ void irq_exit(void)
{
irq_exit_rcu();
rcu_irq_exit();
- /* must be last! */
- lockdep_hardirq_exit();
}
/*
--
2.26.2
> Guenter
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists