linux-kernel - Re: block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6c8ebd7-ccd3-2a94-05b2-7b92a30ec8a9@web.de>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:48:43 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, hulkci@...wei.com,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get()

>> I am trying to contribute a bit of patch review as usual.
>
> Please stop criticising people's commit messages.  Your suggestions
> are usually not improvements.

The details can vary also for my suggestions.
Would you point any more disagreemnents out on concrete items?


> But refcount -> reference count is not particularly interesting.

Can a wording clarification become helpful also for this issue?

Regards,
Markus