linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi-mmc: do not hide address in sunxi_mmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:18:10 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>
Cc:     chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, wens@...e.org, tiny.windzz@...il.com,
        rmfrfs@...il.com, marex@...x.de, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi-mmc: do not hide address in
 sunxi_mmc_irq()

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:55:44PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
> From: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> 
> Using %px to show the actual address in sunxi_mmc_irq()
> to help us to debug issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>

I'm fairly sure this hash is on purpose, and both the commit log of the
%px introduction (ad67b74d2469) and the checkpatch message are pretty
explicit about it.

What issue were you trying to solve here?

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)