[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605151810.vmgnnzp7cadfwsu5@gilmour.lan>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:18:10 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>
Cc: chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, wens@...e.org, tiny.windzz@...il.com,
rmfrfs@...il.com, marex@...x.de, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi-mmc: do not hide address in
sunxi_mmc_irq()
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:55:44PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
> From: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
>
> Using %px to show the actual address in sunxi_mmc_irq()
> to help us to debug issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>
I'm fairly sure this hash is on purpose, and both the commit log of the
%px introduction (ad67b74d2469) and the checkpatch message are pretty
explicit about it.
What issue were you trying to solve here?
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists