[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEExFWuoHhLqt4aukmP30SSXmwnmYuRq2t5HWKUBvreeABg=XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 20:54:51 +0800
From: Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>, chaotian.jing@...iatek.com,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, rmfrfs@...il.com, marex@...x.de,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi-mmc: do not hide address in sunxi_mmc_irq()
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:18 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:55:44PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
> > From: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> >
> > Using %px to show the actual address in sunxi_mmc_irq()
> > to help us to debug issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>
>
> I'm fairly sure this hash is on purpose, and both the commit log of the
> %px introduction (ad67b74d2469) and the checkpatch message are pretty
> explicit about it.
>
> What issue were you trying to solve here?
There doesn't seem to be a strong requirement to force this to be printed out,
I just think that ____ptrval____ is very unpleasant.
Or delete %p directly?
Yangtao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists