lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 06:35:55 +0000
From:   BOUGH CHEN <haibo.chen@....com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, BOUGH CHEN <haibo.chen@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/5] Add MMC software queue support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-mmc-owner@...r.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-mmc-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Baolin Wang
> Sent: 2020年2月19日 9:35
> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>; Asutosh Das
> <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>; Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>; Chunyan
> Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; Linus
> Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>; Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>;
> linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Add MMC software queue support
> 
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:38 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 05:14, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Now the MMC read/write stack will always wait for previous request
> > > is completed by mmc_blk_rw_wait(), before sending a new request to
> > > hardware, or queue a work to complete request, that will bring
> > > context switching overhead, especially for high I/O per second
> > > rates, to affect the IO performance.
> > >
> > > Thus this patch set will introduce the MMC software command queue
> > > support based on command queue engine's interfaces, and set the
> > > queue depth as 64 to allow more requests can be be prepared, merged
> > > and inserted into IO scheduler, but we only allow 2 requests in
> > > flight, that is enough to let the irq handler always trigger the
> > > next request without a context switch, as well as avoiding a long latency.
> > >
> > > Moreover we can expand the MMC software queue interface to support
> > > MMC packed request or packed command instead of adding new
> > > interfaces, according to previosus discussion.
> > >
> > > Below are some comparison data with fio tool. The fio command I used
> > > is like below with changing the '--rw' parameter and enabling the
> > > direct IO flag to measure the actual hardware transfer speed in 4K block
> size.
> > >
> > > ./fio --filename=/dev/mmcblk0p30 --direct=1 --iodepth=20 --rw=read
> > > --bs=4K --size=1G --group_reporting --numjobs=20 --name=test_read
> > >
> > > My eMMC card working at HS400 Enhanced strobe mode:
> > > [    2.229856] mmc0: new HS400 Enhanced strobe MMC card at address
> 0001
> > > [    2.237566] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 29.1 GiB
> > > [    2.242621] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 partition 1 4.00 MiB
> > > [    2.249110] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 partition 2 4.00 MiB
> > > [    2.255307] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 partition 3 4.00 MiB,
> chardev (248:0)
> > >
> > > 1. Without MMC software queue
> > > I tested 5 times for each case and output a average speed.
> > >
> > > 1) Sequential read:
> > > Speed: 59.4MiB/s, 63.4MiB/s, 57.5MiB/s, 57.2MiB/s, 60.8MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 59.66MiB/s
> > >
> > > 2) Random read:
> > > Speed: 26.9MiB/s, 26.9MiB/s, 27.1MiB/s, 27.1MiB/s, 27.2MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 27.04MiB/s
> > >
> > > 3) Sequential write:
> > > Speed: 71.6MiB/s, 72.5MiB/s, 72.2MiB/s, 64.6MiB/s, 67.5MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 69.68MiB/s
> > >
> > > 4) Random write:
> > > Speed: 36.3MiB/s, 35.4MiB/s, 38.6MiB/s, 34MiB/s, 35.5MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 35.96MiB/s
> > >
> > > 2. With MMC software queue
> > > I tested 5 times for each case and output a average speed.
> > >
> > > 1) Sequential read:
> > > Speed: 59.2MiB/s, 60.4MiB/s, 63.6MiB/s, 60.3MiB/s, 59.9MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 60.68MiB/s
> > >
> > > 2) Random read:
> > > Speed: 31.3MiB/s, 31.4MiB/s, 31.5MiB/s, 31.3MiB/s, 31.3MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 31.36MiB/s
> > >
> > > 3) Sequential write:
> > > Speed: 71MiB/s, 71.8MiB/s, 72.3MiB/s, 72.2MiB/s, 71MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 71.66MiB/s
> > >
> > > 4) Random write:
> > > Speed: 68.9MiB/s, 68.7MiB/s, 68.8MiB/s, 68.6MiB/s, 68.8MiB/s Average
> > > speed: 68.76MiB/s
> > >
> > > Form above data, we can see the MMC software queue can help to
> > > improve some performance obviously for random read and write, though
> > > no obvious improvement for sequential read and write.
> > >
> > > Any comments are welcome. Thanks a lot.
> > >

Hi Baolin,

I refer to your code, and add the software queue support on i.MX based on the Linux next-20200602, but unfortunately, I see an obvious performance drop when change to use software queue.
I test on our imx850-evk board, with eMMC soldered.
From the result listing below, only random write has a little performance improve, for others, seems performance drop a lot.
I noticed that, this software queue need no-removable card, any other limitation? For host?
From the code logic, software queue complete the request in irq handler, seems no other change, I do not figure out why this will trigger a performance drop on my platform. Any comment would be appreciate! 
 
Without software queue, normal read/write method:
Sequential read: 56MB/s
Random read: 23.5MB/s
Sequential write: 43.7MB/s
Random write: 19MB/s

With mmc software queue:
Sequential read: 33.5MB/s
Random read: 18.7 MB/s
Sequential write: 37.7MB/s
Random write: 19.8MB/s


Here, I also list my change code to support software queue 

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
index eb85237bf2d6..996b8cc5c381 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
@@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
        depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
        select MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
        select MMC_CQHCI
+       select MMC_HSQ
        help
          This selects the Freescale eSDHC/uSDHC controller support
          found on i.MX25, i.MX35 i.MX5x and i.MX6x.
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index 1d7f84b23a22..6f163695b08d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
 #include "sdhci-esdhc.h"
 #include "cqhci.h"
+#include "mmc_hsq.h"

 #define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK      0x0f
 #define        ESDHC_CTRL_D3CD                 0x08
@@ -1220,6 +1221,15 @@ static u32 esdhc_cqhci_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
        return 0;
 }

+static void esdhc_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
+{
+       /* Validate if the request was from software queue firstly. */
+       if (mmc_hsq_finalize_request(host->mmc, mrq))
+               return;
+
+       mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
+}
+
 static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
        .read_l = esdhc_readl_le,
        .read_w = esdhc_readw_le,
@@ -1237,6 +1247,7 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
        .set_uhs_signaling = esdhc_set_uhs_signaling,
        .reset = esdhc_reset,
        .irq = esdhc_cqhci_irq,
+       .request_done = esdhc_request_done,
 };

 static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata = {
@@ -1301,6 +1312,19 @@ static void sdhci_esdhc_imx_hwinit(struct sdhci_host *host)
                        writel(tmp, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VEND_SPEC2);

                        host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_BUSY_IRQ;
+
+                       /*
+                        * On i.MX8MM, we are running Dual Linux OS, with 1st Linux using SD Card
+                        * as rootfs storage, 2nd Linux using eMMC as rootfs storage. We let the
+                        * the 1st linux configure power/clock for the 2nd Linux.
+                        *
+                        * When the 2nd Linux is booting into rootfs stage, we let the 1st Linux
+                        * to destroy the 2nd linux, then restart the 2nd linux, we met SDHCI dump.
+                        * After we clear the pending interrupt and halt CQCTL, issue gone.
+                        */
+                       tmp = cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_IS);
+                       cqhci_writel(cq_host, tmp, CQHCI_IS);
+                       cqhci_writel(cq_host, CQHCI_HALT, CQHCI_CTL);
                }

                if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
@@ -1351,9 +1375,6 @@ static void sdhci_esdhc_imx_hwinit(struct sdhci_host *host)
                 * After we clear the pending interrupt and halt CQCTL, issue gone.
                 */
                if (cq_host) {
-                       tmp = cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_IS);
-                       cqhci_writel(cq_host, tmp, CQHCI_IS);
-                       cqhci_writel(cq_host, CQHCI_HALT, CQHCI_CTL);
                }
        }
 }
@@ -1555,6 +1576,7 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
        struct sdhci_host *host;
        struct cqhci_host *cq_host;
+       struct mmc_hsq *hsq;
        int err;
        struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data;

@@ -1664,6 +1686,16 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                err = cqhci_init(cq_host, host->mmc, false);
                if (err)
                        goto disable_ahb_clk;
+       } else if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
+               hsq = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsq), GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!hsq) {
+                       err = -ENOMEM;
+                       goto disable_ahb_clk;
+               }
+
+               err = mmc_hsq_init(hsq, host->mmc);
+               if (err)
+                       goto disable_ahb_clk;
        }

        if (of_id)
@@ -1673,6 +1705,11 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        if (err)
                goto disable_ahb_clk;

+       if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host->mmc))
+               host->mmc_host_ops.request_atomic = sdhci_request_atomic;
+       else
+               host->always_defer_done = true;
+
        sdhci_esdhc_imx_hwinit(host);

        err = sdhci_add_host(host);
@@ -1737,6 +1774,8 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_suspend(struct device *dev)
                ret = cqhci_suspend(host->mmc);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
+       } else if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
+               mmc_hsq_suspend(host->mmc);
        }

        if ((imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STATE_LOST_IN_LPMODE) &&
@@ -1764,6 +1803,8 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 static int sdhci_esdhc_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+       struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+       struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
        int ret;

        ret = pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
@@ -1777,8 +1818,11 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_resume(struct device *dev)
        if (ret)
                return ret;

-       if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE)
+       if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE) {
                ret = cqhci_resume(host->mmc);
+       } else if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
+               mmc_hsq_resume(host->mmc);
+       }

        if (!ret)
                ret = mmc_gpio_set_cd_wake(host->mmc, false);
@@ -1799,6 +1843,8 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
                ret = cqhci_suspend(host->mmc);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
+       } else if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
+               mmc_hsq_suspend(host->mmc);
        }

        ret = sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(host);
@@ -1851,8 +1897,11 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
        if (err)
                goto disable_ipg_clk;

-       if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE)
+       if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE) {
                err = cqhci_resume(host->mmc);
+       } else if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
+               mmc_hsq_resume(host->mmc);
+       }

        return err;



> > > Changes from v8:
> > >  - Add more description in the commit message.
> > >  - Optimize the failure log when calling cqe_enable().
> > >
> > > Changes from v7:
> > >  - Add reviewed tag from Arnd.
> > >  - Use the 'hsq' acronym for varibles and functions in the core layer.
> > >  - Check the 'card->ext_csd.cmdq_en' in cqhci.c to make sure the CQE
> > > can work normally.
> > >  - Add a new patch to enable the host software queue for the SD card.
> > >  - Use the default MMC queue depth for host software queue.
> > >
> > > Changes from v6:
> > >  - Change the patch order and set host->always_defer_done = true for
> > > the  Spreadtrum host driver.
> > >
> > > Changes from v5:
> > >  - Modify the condition of defering to complete request suggested by
> Adrian.
> > >
> > > Changes from v4:
> > >  - Add a seperate patch to introduce a variable to defer to complete
> > > data requests for some host drivers, when using host software queue.
> > >
> > > Changes from v3:
> > >  - Use host software queue instead of sqhci.
> > >  - Fix random config building issue.
> > >  - Change queue depth to 32, but still only allow 2 requests in flight.
> > >  - Update the testing data.
> > >
> > > Changes from v2:
> > >  - Remove reference to 'struct cqhci_host' and 'struct cqhci_slot',
> > > instead adding 'struct sqhci_host', which is only used by software queue.
> > >
> > > Changes from v1:
> > >  - Add request_done ops for sdhci_ops.
> > >  - Replace virtual command queue with software queue for functions
> > > and  variables.
> > >  - Rename the software queue file and add sqhci.h header file.
> > >
> > > Baolin Wang (5):
> > >   mmc: Add MMC host software queue support
> > >   mmc: core: Enable the MMC host software queue for the SD card
> > >   mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops
> > >   mmc: host: sdhci: Add a variable to defer to complete requests if
> > >     needed
> > >   mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: Add software queue support
> > >
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/block.c      |   61 ++++++++
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c        |   18 ++-
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c      |   22 ++-
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c         |   10 ++
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig      |    8 +
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/Makefile     |    1 +
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/cqhci.c      |    8 +-
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c    |  343
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h    |   30 ++++
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c |   28 ++++
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c      |   14 +-
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h      |    3 +
> > >  include/linux/mmc/host.h      |    3 +
> > >  13 files changed, 534 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)  create mode
> > > 100644 drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c  create mode 100644
> > > drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.7.9.5
> > >
> >
> > Applied for next, thanks! Also, thanks for your patience while moving
> > forward during the reviews!
> 
> I am very appreciated for you and Arnd's good sugestion when introducing the
> hsq.
> 
> >
> > Note, I did some amending of patch1 to resolve some checkpatch
> > warnings. SPDX licence and Kconfig help texts, please have a look and
> > tell if there are something that doesn't look good.
> 
> Thanks for your help and looks good to me.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ